Re: Patch tags [was writeout stalls in current -git]

[Adrian Bunk]

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:10:47AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > What's missing is a definition which of them are formal tags that must 
> > be explicitely given (look at point 13 in SubmittingPatches).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: and Reviewed-by: are the formal tags someone must have 
> > explicitely given and that correspond to some statement.
> > 
> > OTOH, I can translate a "sounds fine" or "works for me" someone else 
> > gave me into an Acked-by: resp. Tested-by: tag.
> 
> The discussion of the Cc: tag says:
> 
> 	This is the only tag which might be added without an explicit
> 	action by the person it names.
> 
> I think that addresses your comment, no?  Certainly I wouldn't feel that
> I could add any of the other tags to a patch I posted - that's the job
> of the person named there.  

Acked-by: and Tested-by: do require explicit actions by the person they 
name, but they are not required to explicitely give this tag.

If a user said "the patch works for me" I would consider it overly 
bureaucratic to ask the user for a formal tag.

> jon

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/