Re: pktcdvd oops

[Peter Osterlund]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Peter Osterlund wrote:
> > If the
> > __module_get() is not safe because the module code could have already
> > been unloaded, how can it possibly be made safe by adding more code to
> > the pktcdvd module? If the module is unloaded, trying to execute its
> > code can't be a good thing no matter what the code does.
>
> sysfs itself is now out of module lifespan rules.  sysfs callbacks are
> guaranteed to stay in memory while running by sysfs node removal waiting
> for completion of in-flight operations before returning.  In pktcdvd's
> case, class_destroy() call in pkt_sysfs_cleanup() will wait for all
> in-flight sysfs r/w ops to complete.
>
> So, even while sysfs callbacks are executing, the module beneath can die
> but it will stay in memory till all the callbacks return.  You need to
> test module liveness using try_module_get() (and it can fail) if you
> want to grab module reference from sysfs callbacks.

Thanks for the explanation.

Given that explanation, I think the patch is correct and it does fix the 
BUG on my computer. Can you please push it upstream?

In any case:

Acked-by: Peter Osterlund <petero2@xxxxxxxxx>

--
Peter Osterlund - petero2@xxxxxxxxx
http://web.telia.com/~u89404340
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/