Re: [PATCH] frv: Remove bogus NO_IRQ = -1 define

[David Howells]

Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete
> and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as
> IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be
> zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time.
> 
> arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes
> needing doing I guess

FRV doesn't use IRQ 0, so using 0 instead is fine.

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/