Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

[Adrian Bunk]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:06:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > How should TOMOYO implement it's "match one character" in a pattern
> > (used to allow or deny access in a name-based MAC)?
> 
> .. I think such a design is fundamentally bogus. You don't have 
> "characters". You have "bytes".

Users are used to work on characters, not on bytes.

> So you either implement "match one byte", or you go crazy. It's that 
> simple.

Sure, you can limit what is possible and what not.

But there are still many pitfalls, e.g. if someone would allow the 
construct "[abc]" in patterns for matching one of these characters you'd 
have to ensure that your syntax contains explicit character delimiters 
or a pattern might match something completely different from what was 
intended.

My opinion is that extended parsing of non-ASCII strings will cause too 
many problems, but it seems we can only agree to disagree on this.

> 		Linus

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/