Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround

[Ulrich Drepper]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Having access to the same IPCs in different pid namespaces won't work.
> Having access to the same filesystem in different IPC namespaces won't work.
> Having access to the same UID namespace in different VFS namespaces won't work.
> Having access to the same <any> namespace in different <many others> namespace
>  wont' work.
> [...]


Then explicitly prevent the cases which cannot work in the clone()
calls.  Yes, giving people rope to shoot themselves is a Unix tradition
but it's so unnecessary in this case and will only cause support
problems for innocent people.

I bet the result will be that if you have a separate PID namespace you
need to enforce every other namespace as well.  There are simply too
many dependencies.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHK/pL2ijCOnn/RHQRAtp6AKC8QIRvJa4qVUSx9IVpRq6X+6HPGQCff/hT
m2tpKWmeM+xAfS5ICvB0NVk=
=5ozn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/