Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:55:02 +0300 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >> The "fix" I mention is just returning -EINVAL in case user orders 
> >> CLONE_NEWPIDS
> > 
> > That is the "fix" you were referring to?  I was hoping you have a sketch
> > for a real solution.  If nobody can think of a way to fix this PID
> 
> Looks like we misunderstood each other. Can you please elaborate on 
> what exactly is broken in pid namespaces?

Isn't it this?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/1/141

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/