Re: [PATCH 2/2] Blackfin I2C/TWI driver: add missing pin mux operation

[Mike Frysinger]

On 10/30/07, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> +static int setup_pin_mux(int action, struct bfin_twi_iface *iface)
> +{
> +
> +       u16 pin_req[2][3] = {
> +               {P_TWI0_SCL, P_TWI0_SDA, 0},
> +               {P_TWI1_SCL, P_TWI1_SDA, 0},
> +       };

might be better to have this in the boards file ... consider the
scenario on the BF54x where the user wants to use I2C0 and not I2C1 or
vice versa so that they can use the set of pins for something else ...
this would prevent such a setup

> +       if (action) {
> +               if (peripheral_request_list(pin_req[iface->bus_num], DRV_NAME))
> +                       return -EFAULT;
> +       } else {
> +               peripheral_free_list(pin_req[iface->bus_num]);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}

EFAULT is incorrect i think ... want to pass back the actual value
from peripheral_request_list()

> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> +static int setup_pin_mux(int action, struct bfin_twi_iface *iface)
> +{
> +
> +       u16 pin_req[2][3] = {
> +               {P_TWI0_SCL, P_TWI0_SDA, 0},
> +               {P_TWI1_SCL, P_TWI1_SDA, 0},
> +       };

might be better to have this in the boards file ... consider the
scenario on the BF54x where the user wants to use I2C0 and not I2C1 or
vice versa so that they can use the set of pins for something else ...
this would prevent such a setup

       if (action)
               return peripheral_request_list(pin_req[iface->bus_num],
DRV_NAME);
       else
               peripheral_free_list(pin_req[iface->bus_num]);

       return 0;
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/