Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?

[Jeff Garzik]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ismail DÃnmez wrote:
> > Thursday 25 October 2007 Tarihinde 17:55:00 yazmÄÅtÄ:
> > > I think the OpenBSD people decided to actually do something about this,
> > > and I suspect it had *nothing* to do with license issues, and everything
> > > to do with these kinds of problems. I wish them all the luck, although
> > > personally I think LLVM is a much more interesting project.
> >
> > And on the LLVM side all hopes for clang [0] at least for better C++ 
> > error reporting ;-)
> >
> > [0] http://clang.llvm.org/
>
> Someone should take 'sparse' and use that as a C language front-end to 
> LLVM...

Among clang's "features":
	"A single unified parser for C/ObjC/C++"

bleh.  I cannot imagine how ugly a C parser gets, after being taught 
C++.  IMO since you can basically redefine everything in C++, it's not a 
language but a proto-language.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/