Re: [RFC/git patch] move samples/ to Documentation/markers/

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:12:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > Honestly, I don't care at all about building the code.  If that's what 
> > you want, great.
> 
> Yes, that is wanted.  They bitrot too easily -- not good.
> 
> > My objection is more to adding a samples/ directory, which is contra to 
> > past experience:
> > 
> > A new net driver sample should go in drivers/net/ like the existing 
> > skeleton files I already listed, not samples/net/.  A top-level 
> 
> Can't disagree with that.
> 
> > "samples/" seems like it exists only duplicate the rest of the tree 
> > hierarchy.
> 
> It seems odd to be building code in Documentation/, but I can live
> with that.  It was primarily Christoph who was opposed to that.
> He suggested samples/ and I went along with it just to break the
> impasse (since no one else was making any comments on it at that
> time).
> 
> Sam, would building code in Documentation/ cause problems for
> kbuild?
I have this pipe dream that we shall introduce a tool to make the
.txt doc readable in some popular format (HTML?) and then we would
have that Makefile in Documentation/ but that could be a special target
so should be OK.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/