Re: [PATCH 6/12] KVM: work around SMP requirement

[Jeff Garzik]

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:36:40PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > KVM is currently completely broken for the !CONFIG_SMP case.
> >
> > drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c: In function âkvm_flush_remote_tlbsâ:
> > drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c:220: error: implicit declaration of function âsmp_call_function_maskâ
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > I hope the KVM maintainer can come up with a better solution...
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/kvm/Kconfig b/drivers/kvm/Kconfig
> > index 8749fa4..e35fbc6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/kvm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/kvm/Kconfig
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION
> >  
> >  config KVM
> >  	tristate "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support"
> > -	depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL
> > +	depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL && SMP
> > ...
>
> Assuming it won't get fixed soon, the pattern would be "(SMP || BROKEN)".
>
> The effect is the same, but this makes it more obvious that KVM 
> does not depend architecturally on SMP but just broken.
>
> Of course, the preferred solution is to simply get KVM fixed...

In general I agree, but I specifically avoided CONFIG_BROKEN in case it 
was an intentional choice to require an SMP kernel.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/