Re: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000.

From: Dave Jones
Date: Tue Oct 23 2007 - 17:21:15 EST


On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> > In any case, this patch should not be merged. We often send it around to users to
> > debug their issue in case it involves eeproms, but merging it will just conceal
> > the real issue and all of a sudden a flood of people stop reporting *real* issues
> > to us.
>
> Sorry, I disagree. Just as with e100, if there is a clear way the user
> can recover their setup -- and Adam says his was effective -- I don't
> see why we should be denying users the ability to use their own hardware.

Indeed. This is a common enough problem that not including it causes more pain
than its worth. I have two affected boxes myself that I actually thought
the hardware was dead before I tried ajax's patch.

People aren't going to report this as a bug. They aren't going to try out patches,
they're going to do what I did and stick another network card in the box and
go on with life.

Our users deserve better than this.

Dave

--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/