Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority isactually changing

[Gregory Haskins]

On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 04:48 +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > We can avoid dirtying a rq related cacheline with a simple check, so why not.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> I think you wanted a patch here?

Hi Roel,
  I had forgotten to refresh before mailing the patches, but I sent an
immediate followup (which unfortunately was not linked to the original
posting.  For your reference, here is the reposting:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.rt.user/1626

Sorry for the confusion!

Regards,
-Greg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part