Re: [PATCH 2/9] irq-remove: arch non-trivial

[Eric W. Biederman]

Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> commit 8d45690dd90b18daaa21b981ab20caf393220bf0
> Author: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Oct 19 00:46:23 2007 -0400
>
>     [IRQ ARG REMOVAL] various non-trivial arch updates
>
>  arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c     |    3 ++-
>  include/asm-x86/irq_regs_32.h |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> 8d45690dd90b18daaa21b981ab20caf393220bf0
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
> index 157e4be..18aae9e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
> @@ -739,10 +739,11 @@ static int irqbits;
>  	| (1 << SIGUSR1) | (1 << SIGUSR2) | (1 << SIGIO)  | (1 << SIGURG) \
>  	| (1 << SIGUNUSED) )
>  	
> -static irqreturn_t irq_handler(int intno, void *dev_id)
> +static irqreturn_t irq_handler(void *dev_id)
>  {
>  	int irq_bit;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned int intno = get_irqfunc_irq();
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&irqbits_lock, flags);	
>  	irq_bit = 1 << intno;

In this case we can easily pass the irqno into request_irq, allowing
us to do "unsigned int intno = (unsigned int)dev_id;".

I suspect this is the case for the majority of the non-trivial users
as well.

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/