Re: [PATCH] ibmpex: Change printk to dev_{info,err} macros

From: Jean Delvare
Date: Fri Oct 19 2007 - 04:54:25 EST


Hi Darrick,

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:15:03 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Clean up printk use in ibmpex to use dev_err/dev_info macros and reword
> some of the messages to be a bit more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
> index c462824..3c8278b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c
> @@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ static int ibmpex_send_message(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data)
>
> return 0;
> out1:
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: request_settime=%x\n", __FUNCTION__, err);
> + dev_err(data->bmc_device, "request_settime=%x\n", err);
> return err;
> out:
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: validate_addr=%x\n", __FUNCTION__, err);
> + dev_err(data->bmc_device, "validate_addr=%x\n", err);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -161,14 +161,14 @@ static int ibmpex_ver_check(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data)
> data->sensor_major = data->rx_msg_data[0];
> data->sensor_minor = data->rx_msg_data[1];
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO DRVNAME ": Found BMC with sensor interface "
> - "v%d.%d %d-%02d-%02d on interface %d\n",
> - data->sensor_major,
> - data->sensor_minor,
> - extract_value(data->rx_msg_data, 2),
> - data->rx_msg_data[4],
> - data->rx_msg_data[5],
> - data->interface);
> + dev_info(data->bmc_device, "Found BMC with sensor interface "
> + "v%d.%d %d-%02d-%02d on interface %d\n",
> + data->sensor_major,
> + data->sensor_minor,
> + extract_value(data->rx_msg_data, 2),
> + data->rx_msg_data[4],
> + data->rx_msg_data[5],
> + data->interface);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int ibmpex_query_sensor_data(struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data, int sensor)
> wait_for_completion(&data->read_complete);
>
> if (data->rx_result || data->rx_msg_len < 26) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading sensor %d, please check.\n",
> - sensor);
> + dev_err(data->bmc_device, "Error reading sensor %d.\n",
> + sensor);
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> @@ -456,8 +456,7 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
>
> data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR DRVNAME ": Insufficient memory for BMC "
> - "interface %d.\n", data->interface);
> + dev_err(dev, "Insufficient memory for BMC interface.\n");
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -471,9 +470,8 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
> err = ipmi_create_user(data->interface, &driver_data.ipmi_hndlrs,
> data, &data->user);
> if (err < 0) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR DRVNAME ": Error, unable to register user with "
> - "ipmi interface %d\n",
> - data->interface);
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to register user with IPMI "
> + "interface %d\n", data->interface);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -495,9 +493,9 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
> data->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(data->bmc_device);
>
> if (IS_ERR(data->hwmon_dev)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR DRVNAME ": Error, unable to register hwmon "
> - "class device for interface %d\n",
> - data->interface);
> + dev_err(data->bmc_device, "Unable to register hwmon "
> + "device for IPMI interface %d\n",
> + data->interface);
> goto out_user;
> }
>
> @@ -508,7 +506,7 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
> /* Now go find all the sensors */
> err = ibmpex_find_sensors(data);
> if (err) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Error %d allocating memory\n", err);
> + dev_err(data->bmc_device, "Error %d allocating memory\n", err);

This message might be misleading, as there are other reasons why
ibmpex_find_sensors() can fail.

> goto out_register;
> }
>
> @@ -561,10 +559,10 @@ static void ibmpex_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, void *user_msg_data)
> struct ibmpex_bmc_data *data = (struct ibmpex_bmc_data *)user_msg_data;
>
> if (msg->msgid != data->tx_msgid) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Received msgid (%02x) and transmitted "
> - "msgid (%02x) mismatch!\n",
> - (int)msg->msgid,
> - (int)data->tx_msgid);
> + dev_err(data->bmc_device, "Mismatch between received msgid "
> + "(%02x) and transmitted msgid (%02x)!\n",
> + (int)msg->msgid,
> + (int)data->tx_msgid);
> ipmi_free_recv_msg(msg);
> return;
> }

Other than that, the patch looks OK:

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/