Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings

[Vegard Nossum]

On 10/11/07, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:17:02 +0200 Vegard Nossum wrote:
>
> > This makes sure printk format strings are string literals containing no
> > more than a single line.
>
> Each patch needs justification (unless it is blatantly obvious).
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  init/calibrate.c        |    4 +++-
> >  init/do_mounts_initrd.c |    5 ++++-
> >  init/main.c             |    2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/init/do_mounts_initrd.c b/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> > index fd4fc12..ad6174c 100644
> > --- a/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> > +++ b/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> > @@ -98,7 +98,10 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(void)
> >                       error = sys_ioctl(fd, BLKFLSBUF, 0);
> >                       sys_close(fd);
> >               }
> > -             printk(!error ? "okay\n" : "failed\n");
> > +             if(error)
> > +                     printk("failed\n");
> > +             else
> > +                     printk("okay\n");
> >       }
> >  }
>
> Why this one?
> and if it must change, use:
>                 if (error)
> but I see little need for the change.

Oops about the space. And it's to make the format string a constant
literal. If it isn't, you are going to run into trouble with options
to remove printks at compile-time based on log-level token. I realize
it's not really an issue at this point in time, but I assume that it
will eventually make its way into the kernel in some way or another.

Vegard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/