Re: pm qos infrastructure and interface

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:17:04 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm a bit surprised that this change appears to have no
> configurability. If one has set CONFIG_PM=n (for example), shouldn't
> it all go away?

I suppose it's a matter of taste, but at least personally I believe that
userspace exposed ABI's shouldn't be configurable as a starting point
(if the code delta is 100's of kilobytes it's a different topic); what
point is talking about a stable ABI if it's there or not half the
time... that's the ultimate instability.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/