Re: syntax highlighting, emacs ([PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2))

[Oleg Verych]

On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:43:46PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Oct 7 2007 22:50, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> >In fact mc config (ini) section is a better way.
> 
> Yes, for the default colors. But /usr/share/mc/syntax/ specifies
> more of them.

Syntax highlighting, OK.

Kind of funny thing with it. One for shell in `mcedit` is much nicer, but
`emacs` is more powerful as editor(R). But both have highlighting
problems with non trivial scripts (quoiting, data here, etc). I don't
know if it will ever be fixed :).

Comprehensive highlighting of contents of diffs (or even _patched_
sources) is XXII century feature.

Anyway if anybody have anything to look onto, like more Linux C types,
bogus coding style highlighting, i'll be glad to test. And any
emacs hacks, that gurus are using will be very appreciated.

[0] emacs setup and fontlocking <ftp://flower.upol.cz/emacs/>

> >I use default blue (which is very annoying)
> 
> If blue were annoying, it would not be the default Windows background
> (since Windows 2000). Then again, it's personal preference,

Emacs have black background by default. I changed foreground to green,
and it is much nicer for long runs. Blue (or any bright) background
isn't comfortable, i think.

> so I suppose you have a red/green desktop wallpaper for X11?

Black background mostly. If you know classic blackbox wm (version <=
0.62), then Rancor(80%) and Artwiz(20%) my all time styles. But i use
no X for quite some time now.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/