Re: [PATCH 2/3] Prepare pid_nr() etc functions to work with not-NULL pids

[Matt Mackall]

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:54:17PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:20:43PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >> Just make the __pid_nr() etc functions that expect the argument
> >> to always be not NULL.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> >>  static inline pid_t pid_nr(struct pid *pid)
> >>  {
> >>  	pid_t nr = 0;
> >>  	if (pid)
> >> -		nr = pid->numbers[0].nr;
> >> +		nr = __pid_nr(pid);
> >>  	return nr;
> >>  }
> > 
> > Is there a patch that removes these inlines? Otherwise this looks good
> > to me.
> 
> Not yet. Some of are uninlined already, but others are not. I'd like 
> to make some testing before uninline them.

I was asking about the whole function, actually, not the keyword. Is
this function not equivalent to __pid_nr now?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/