Re: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo)in examples

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu Oct 04 2007 - 06:20:57 EST


On Thu 2007-10-04 11:51:35, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Oct 4 2007 11:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> >index 7f1730f..1595a45 100644
> >--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> >+++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> >@@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ used for indentation, and the above exam
> >
> > Get a decent editor and don't leave whitespace at the end of lines.
> >
> >+Bitfield variables should be indented like this:
> >+
> >+ unsigned int foo :1;
>
> Current code uses foo:1.

I'm fine with foo :1 or foo:1. It just would be nice to have example
specifying one way...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/