[PATCH 28/51] [GFS2] Patch to protect sd_log_num_jdata

[swhiteho]

From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>

This is a patch to GFS2 to protect sd_log_num_jdata with the
gfs2_log_lock.  Without this patch, there is a timing window
where you can get hit the following assert from function
gfs2_log_flush():

gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp,
			sdp->sd_log_num_buf + sdp->sd_log_num_jdata ==
			sdp->sd_log_commited_buf +
			sdp->sd_log_commited_databuf);

I've tested it on my roth cluster and it fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lops.c b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
index a0371f8..7ef3356 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/lops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
@@ -492,11 +492,12 @@ static void databuf_lo_add(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_log_element *le)
 
 	gfs2_trans_add_gl(bd->bd_gl);
 	if (gfs2_is_jdata(ip)) {
-		sdp->sd_log_num_jdata++;
 		gfs2_pin(sdp, bd->bd_bh);
 		tr->tr_num_databuf_new++;
 	}
 	gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
+	if (gfs2_is_jdata(ip))
+		sdp->sd_log_num_jdata++;
 	sdp->sd_log_num_databuf++;
 	list_add(&le->le_list, &sdp->sd_log_le_databuf);
 	gfs2_log_unlock(sdp);
-- 
1.5.1.2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/