Re: [PATCH 0/5] Boot protocol changes

[H. Peter Anvin]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>  
> No, not at all.
>
> I'm proposing that the existing bzImage format be retained, but that the 
> payload of the decompressor (already a gzip file) simply be vmlinux.gz 
> -- i.e. a gzip compressed ELF file, notes and all.  A pointer in the 
> header will point to the offset of the payload (this is new, obviously.)
>
> The decompression stub is adjusted to expect an ELF image, instead of a 
> raw binary.
>
> Existing bootloaders (16- or 32-bit) simply load the bzImage the way 
> they do now; new bootloaders have the option of accessing the vmlinux.gz 
> directly if they either want to load it themselves or want to examine 
> the notes.

Slight correction: it does, of course, break loaders which root through 
the bzImage for a gzip header and decode that themselves and place in 
memory.  These loaders are pretty broken, though; they can't deal with 
the fact that the physical address of the kernel is configurable, for 
one thing.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/