Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the 
> > > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet.
> 
> i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog 
> bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found 
> and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)

C1e and now the misrouted irq 0s Thomas reported.

Also i'm a little worried about the missing C1e check; it looks
like it needs a re-review to make sure not other infrastructure was 
missing.

> 
> > hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding 
> > precisely what the remaining issues are.
> 
> i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged. 
> Demand from users and distros is high.

I'm aware of that. No argument on that it will eventually go in.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/