Re: [PATCH 4/5] Move the user namespace under the option

From: Pavel Emelyanov
Date: Mon Oct 01 2007 - 04:01:19 EST


Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
>>> index b5f41d4..dda160c 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct user_namespace {
>>>
>>> extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NAMESPACES_EXPERIMENTAL
>
> is it really a good precedent to introduce Kconfig variables that
> literally include the word "EXPERIMENTAL"?

How else can we call it? I proposed one config option for
each namespace with "depends on EXPERIMENTAL" dependency,
but everyone else said that two options are much better.

> rday

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/