Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
From: Mark Lord
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 08:34:30 EST
Alan Cox wrote:
Why 512 words ?
Though I have queued Mark's patch to be applied, my gut feeling would
lean towards a single DRQ block, rather than 512.
Why not just work from the old IDE code.
If someone needs that, they can override the error handler with their
own. No need for a new op.
+ ata_drain_fifo(ap, qc);
might be wiser
Alan, you're the expert there (my condolences!).
Can you generate a fix for the PDC202xx to go with this?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/