Re: regression in 2.6.23-rc8 - power off failed

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 04:30:57 EST

Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> Both are bad.
> Two different systems and two different bisections.
> I sent the last step of each.

>>> $ git bisect good
>>> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
>>> [626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine for new x86 setup code
>> OK, so which one is the bad one?
> This problem (no power off) persists after pull some minutes ago.
> Sorry for the confusion.

I believe there must have been something wrong here (possibly
inconsistent experiments?) This checkin has *zero code changes* from
the previous one (and next one) -- the kernel should have been binarily
identical to the previous one. The code introduced in this checkin
doesn't even get compiled until two checkins later,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at