Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask
From: Paul Jackson
Date: Fri Sep 28 2007 - 14:38:26 EST
Mel replied to Lee:
> > > + return nodes_intersect(nodemask, current->mems_allowed);
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- should be nodes_intersects, I think.
> Crap, you're right, I missed the warning about implicit declarations. I
> apologise. This is the corrected version
I found myself making that same error, saying 'nodes_intersect' instead
of 'nodes_intersects' the other day. And I might be the one who invented
that name ;).
This would probably be too noisey and too little gain to do on the
Linux kernel, but if this was just a little private project of my own,
I'd be running a script over the whole thing, modifying all 30 or so
instances of bitmap_intersects, cpus_intersects and nodes_intersects so
as to remove the final 's' character.
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/