Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Sep 28 2007 - 02:25:24 EST


On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:26 -0700 Mark Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +#define QOS_RESERVED 0
> +#define QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY 2
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT 3
> +
> +#define QOS_NUM_CLASSES 4
> +#define QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE -1
> +
> +int qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value);
> +int qos_update_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 new_value);
> +void qos_remove_requirement(int qos, char *name);

It's a bit rude stealing the entire "qos" namespace like this - there are
many different forms of QoS, some already in-kernel.

s/qos/pm_qos/g ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/