Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: ptrace CHECK_FULL_REGS
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Mon Sep 24 2007 - 23:59:27 EST
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 17:59 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Yup, I think I ditched most of them.. for some reason I decided it
> > couldn't happen, but maybe I'm wrong ?
> Well, it's a BUG_ON. It's supposed to be for something that "can't happen".
> That's why it's a sanity check, not a wild assertion. ;-)
> The 2/2 patch is an example of a bug that CHECK_FULL_REGS catches.
> In the status quo, using PTRACE_PEEKUSR in a bug case crashes while using
> PTRACE_GETREGS in the same place might get bogus data. (In the actual bug
> thus found, the data is not bogus and only the bit that FULL_REGS checks is.)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/