Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: implement module_inhibit_unload()
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Mon Sep 24 2007 - 19:43:17 EST
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:18 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Given your description of this tool as a "sledgehammer," might it not be
> > easier to just take and hold module_mutex for the duration of the unload
> > block?
> That would be easier but...
> * It would serialize users of the sledgehammer.
> * It would block loading modules (which is often more important than
> unloading them) when things go south.
My concern is that you're dropping the module mutex around ->exit now.
I don't *think* this should matter, but it's worth considering.
I really wonder if an explicit "kill_this_attribute()" is a better way
to go than this...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/