Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Concerns about the console handover

From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Mon Sep 24 2007 - 13:14:38 EST


On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Russell King wrote:

> > I see no problem with implementing the ->pm() call as something like:
> >
> > void zs_pm(struct uart_port uport, unsigned int state, unsigned int oldstate)
> > {
> > struct zs_port *zport = to_zport(uport);
> >
> > if (state < 3)
> > zport->regs[5] |= TxENAB;
> > else
> > zport->regs[5] &= ~TxENAB;
> > write_zsreg(zport, R5, zport->regs[5]);
> > }
> >
> > itself, but it looks more like a workaround than a fix to me. I'll have
> > to think about it and also double-check it is safe. The SCC is about as
> > complicated as you can get with a serial port.
>
> You will need the serial patch from the above mbox.

I have got it now and tried together with the function above and some
minor adjustments as appropriate elsewhere. It seems to work; by
coincidence (because of the sequence the bootstrap initialisation of the
console and the serial core is done) it even works when the selected real
console is other than the bootstrap one. I do not particularly like to
have things working by accident and I stand by what I said previously
about this approach looking hackish to me.

Though lacking better proposals I suppose this will have to stay. Here
is a change I have implemented; if no further comments are seen, I will
submit it for inclusion.

Maciej

patch-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904-zs-pm-4
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/drivers/serial/zs.c linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/drivers/serial/zs.c
--- linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/drivers/serial/zs.c 2007-09-04 04:55:44.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/drivers/serial/zs.c 2007-09-22 20:25:10.000000000 +0000
@@ -787,7 +787,6 @@ static int zs_startup(struct uart_port *
zport->regs[1] &= ~RxINT_MASK;
zport->regs[1] |= RxINT_ALL | TxINT_ENAB | EXT_INT_ENAB;
zport->regs[3] |= RxENABLE;
- zport->regs[5] |= TxENAB;
zport->regs[15] |= BRKIE;
write_zsreg(zport, R1, zport->regs[1]);
write_zsreg(zport, R3, zport->regs[3]);
@@ -814,7 +813,6 @@ static void zs_shutdown(struct uart_port

spin_lock_irqsave(&scc->zlock, flags);

- zport->regs[5] &= ~TxENAB;
zport->regs[3] &= ~RxENABLE;
write_zsreg(zport, R5, zport->regs[5]);
write_zsreg(zport, R3, zport->regs[3]);
@@ -959,6 +957,23 @@ static void zs_set_termios(struct uart_p
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scc->zlock, flags);
}

+/*
+ * Hack alert!
+ * Required solely so that the initial PROM-based console
+ * works undisturbed in parallel with this one.
+ */
+static void zs_pm(struct uart_port *uport, unsigned int state,
+ unsigned int oldstate)
+{
+ struct zs_port *zport = to_zport(uport);
+
+ if (state < 3)
+ zport->regs[5] |= TxENAB;
+ else
+ zport->regs[5] &= ~TxENAB;
+ write_zsreg(zport, R5, zport->regs[5]);
+}
+

static const char *zs_type(struct uart_port *uport)
{
@@ -1041,6 +1056,7 @@ static struct uart_ops zs_ops = {
.startup = zs_startup,
.shutdown = zs_shutdown,
.set_termios = zs_set_termios,
+ .pm = zs_pm,
.type = zs_type,
.release_port = zs_release_port,
.request_port = zs_request_port,
@@ -1190,6 +1206,7 @@ static int __init zs_console_setup(struc
return ret;

zs_reset(zport);
+ zs_pm(uport, 0, -1);

if (options)
uart_parse_options(options, &baud, &parity, &bits, &flow);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/