Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: IPC: sleeping function called ...

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:34:00 -0700 Andrew Morton
> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Well, it was an optimisation.  spin_lock() implies rcu_read_lock().  That's
> > a bit dirty and we might choose to not do that.
> 
> Not true for the preemptible-rcu work. All such sites should be fixed,
> or at the very least heavily annotated.

What he said!!!

							Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/