-----Original Message-----for
From: Gaston, Jason D
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:10 AM
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
Intel TolapaiOnly
This device has both AHCI and RAID modes that use the ahci driver.the RAID mode DID's are being added as the PCI class code support willas
cover the AHCI mode. Looking at the Generic, PCI class code support
section, it uses "board_ahci". I assumed that they should be the same
the generic class code support is working on this platform.for
Thanks,
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:47 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
Intel Tolapaisupport.
Jason Gaston wrote:Resend trying to remove 8-bit characters in the email.
This patch adds the Intel Tolapai RAID controller DID's for SATA16:58:11.000000000 -Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <jason.d.gaston@xxxxxxxxx>18:32:35.000000000 -0700
--- linux-2.6.23-rc4/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig 2007-08-27+++ linux-2.6.23-rc4/drivers/ata/ahci.c 2007-08-280700@@ -411,6 +411,8 @@Why did you not use board_ahci_pi? Is the AHCI ports-implemented
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x292f), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9M */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x294d), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9 */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x294e), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9M */
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x502a), board_ahci }, /* Tolapai */
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x502b), board_ahci }, /* Tolapai */
register unreliable on this platform?
Jeff,
Do I need to change this to board_ahci_pi or is it ok to leave it at
board_ahci, which will be used by the AHCI class code devices?