Re: [PATCH] x86/x86-64 PCI domain support

[Randy Dunlap]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:40:27 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > > The second function is redundant? 
> > > > > No, it's a hook we must implement, when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS is enabled.
> > > > Then the other function is redundant.
> > > No, both functions are required by the interface.
> >
> > by what interface?  and why, please?  (instead of just stating 
> > "required")
>
> grep for CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS in arch code and include/linux/pci.h.

Thanks, I get it.

> This is normal "arch" interface:  you enable a define, and a group of 
> functions is assumed to be present.  Otherwise (!defined), a set of stub 
> no-ops is activated for your arch.
>
> I have implemented the [small] group of functions the code assumes to be 
> present, when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS is enabled, like all the other arches 
> that implement PCI domain support.


+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
+static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	struct pci_sysdata *sd = bus->sysdata;
+	return sd->domain;
+}
+
+static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	return pci_domain_nr(bus);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */

So if CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y, proc_proc_domain() decides to print the domain nr
in /proc iff the domain nr != 0 ?  so that the /proc file format is
different depending on the domain nr (0 vs. !0) ?

I suppose that is similar to what arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c does
with hose->buid.  I think that I had rather see the domain nr printed
whenever CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y... oh well.


--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/