Re: [PATCH] Patch pvr2 driver to allow development of maple busdriver

[Adrian McMenamin]

On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 23:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> i really dont know how the maple bus works or what piece of hardware is wired 
> up to the same interrupt line.  my point is that if the other device fires an 
> interrupt, the pvr interrupt handler may be executed and attempt to do work 
> when in reality the pvr was not the source of the interrupt.
> -mike

The interrupt is *always* fired by the PVR - it is the VBLANK - ie
essentially screen refresh. It is *never* generated by the maple bus.

However, the maple bus is/can be hardware synced - which means once that
setting is made then the hardware will *always* be polled on the VBLANK.

In other words there is no need to check which device is interrupt is
for, because it is *always* going to be for both of them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/