On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:05 +0100
Firstly some architecture maintainers still haven't updated theirI took a look at this for sparc and I'm currently balking the same way
platform for arbitary tty speeds. The kernel is going to start whining
and issuing warnings on your platform if you don't keep up with the
programme (its been 6 months).
you did :-) The current bit usage on sparc just don't work properly
for what you're trying to do.
I don't see a real problem. You aren't using
c_cflags & CBAUD = 0x00001000
so that could become BOTHER.