Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Christoph Lameter (clameter@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> > > The slow path would require disable preemption and two interrupt disables.
> > If the slow path have to call new_slab, then yes. But it seems that not
> > every slow path must call it, so for the other slow paths, only one
> > interrupt disable would be required.
> 
> If we include new_slab then we get to 3 times:
> 
> 1. In the cmpxchg_local emulation that fails
> 
> 2. For the slow path
> 
> 3. When calling the page allocator.
> 

Hrm, I just want to certify one thing: A lot of code paths seems to go
to the slow path without requiring cmpxchg_local to execute at all. So
is the slow path more likely to be triggered by the (!object),
(!node_match) tests or by these same tests done in the redo after the
initial cmpxchg_local ?

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/