Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re:nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

[Daniel Walker]

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 00:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > [snip]
> > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
> > 
> > Yes, I have considered it.
> > 
> > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
> > a regression field, but there are no difference between
> > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
> > 
> > Most people are reporting bugs through LKML:
> > - 23 regressions with reference to LKML
> > - 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla
> 
> Presumably that's fixable.

I've got some addition grips that I just noticed ..

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8945

I just file the above bugz entry ..

I know who caused the bug , Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx> ..
However I can't assign the bug to him. The field was greyed out and
forced the assignee as other_other@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ..

I tryed to CC: eranian@xxxxxxxxxx , and it said "no match" .. I guess
because he doesn't have an account.. So Stephane has no way to know the
bug exists , other than me emailing him ..

Also I couldn't check the "Regression" box until after I filed the bug..
It would be nice to file the bug in one action if it's possible .. I
don't know bugzilla well enough to know if that's possible tho.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/