Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

[Michal Piotrowski]

On 27/08/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > getting lost.  Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
>
> Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions
> were getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not
> solved?

I have tried to track all regressions, but it is a lot of work, so I
center on development kernels.

There are two lists (both unmaintained)

http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2622
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2621

If you compare them, you will see "New regressions (submitted after
2.6.21 a.k.a. for -stable team)" - a long list of problems reported
after 2.6.21 release. I really do not have time to track issues in
stable releases.

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/