Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across allarchitectures

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 22:17:36 EST


On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> > > We don't need to reload sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated here.
> >
> > Are you sure? How do you know some other CPU hasn't changed the value
> > in between?
>
> The cpu knows because the cacheline was not invalidated.

Crap my statement above is wrong..... We do not care that the
value was changed otherwise we would have put a barrier in there.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/