Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

[Mitchell Erblich]

Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> > Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
> >
> > Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
> > missing is the RT for .task_new.
> 
> No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks.
> 
>         -Mike


Mike, et al,

    one time:  I was told that this group likes bottom posts.

    The logic of class independent code calling class
    scheduling dependent code, assumes that all functions
   are in ALL the class dependent sections.

    Minimally, if I agree with your above statement, I would assume 
    that the function should still exist as a null type function. However,
    in reality,  alot of RT class specific init is done. Just currently 
    none of it is done in this non-existant function.

Mitchell Erblich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/