Re: [PATCH 3/20] Introduce MS_KERNMOUNT flag

[Pavel Emelyanov]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:47:55PM +0400, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This flag tells the .get_sb callback that this is a kern_mount() call
> > so that it can trust *data pointer to be valid in-kernel one. If this
> > flag is passed from the user process, it is cleared since the *data
> > pointer is not a valid kernel object.
> >
> > Running a few steps forward - this will be needed for proc to create the
> > superblock and store a valid pid namespace on it during the namespace
> > creation. The reason, why the namespace cannot live without proc mount
> > is described in the appropriate patch.
>
> I don't like this at all.  We should never pass kernel and userspace
> addresses through the same pointer.  Maybe add an additional argument
> to the get_sb prototype instead.  But this whole idea of mounting /proc
> from kernelspace sounds like a really bad idea to me.  /proc should
> never be mounted from the kernel but always normally from userspace.

Why then is it mounted in proc_root_init()?

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/