Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS sub-ioctls

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 17:02:51 EST


Jeff Garzik wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 4a616d7..559a4dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ struct net_device
#define NETIF_F_GSO 2048 /* Enable software GSO. */
#define NETIF_F_LLTX 4096 /* LockLess TX */
#define NETIF_F_MULTI_QUEUE 16384 /* Has multiple TX/RX queues */
+#define NETIF_F_LRO 32768 /* large receive offload */
/* Segmentation offload features */
#define NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT 16
diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
index 2ab0a60..6e8563e 100644
--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -109,6 +109,32 @@ int ethtool_op_set_ufo(struct net_device *dev, u32 data)
return 0;
}
+/* the following list of flags are the same as their associated
+ * NETIF_F_xxx values in include/linux/netdevice.h
+ */
+static const u32 flags_dup_features =
+ ETH_FLAG_LRO;
+
+u32 ethtool_op_get_flags(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ /* in the future, this function will probably contain additional
+ * handling for flags which are not so easily handled
+ * by a simple masking operation
+ */
+
+ return dev->features & flags_dup_features;
+}
+
+int ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data)
+{
+ if (data & ETH_FLAG_LRO)
+ dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
+ else
+ dev->features &= ~NETIF_F_LRO;
+

And, a side discussion:

This patch copies Auke in adding NETIF_F_LRO. Is that just for temporary merging, or does the net core really not touch it at all?

Because, logically, if NETIF_F_LRO exists nowhere else but this patch, we should not add it to dev->features. LRO knowledge can be contained entirely within the driver, if the net core never tests NETIF_F_LRO.

I haven't reviewed the other NETIF_F_XXX flags, but, that logic can be applied to any other NETIF_F_XXX flag: if the net stack isn't using it, it's a piece of information specific to that driver.

Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/