Re: [PATCH] AFS: Fix file locking

[Nick Piggin]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > So you did. Then to answer that, yes it could be faster because there are
> > stupid volatiles sprinkled all over the bitops code so you could easily
> > end up having to do more loads. Does it make a real difference? Unlikely,
> > but David loves counting cycles :)
>
>
> I thought we long long since removed the volatiles. They are buggy and 
> horrible, and we really want to let the compiler combine multiple 
> test-bits, and if they matter that implies locking is buggy or something 
> worse..
>
> Ie we'd *want*
>
> 	if (test_bit(x, y) || test_bit(z,y))
>
> to be rewritten by the compiler as testing bits x/z at the same time.

Yep. We'd also want __set_bit(x, y); __set_bit(z, y); and such to be
combined.
> But now I'm too scared to look.

Not a chance :) Even the asm-generic "reference" implementation ratifies
the volatile crapiness. Would you take a patch?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/