Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source,take #2

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> that's still an important question, but these changes are still needed 
> nevertheless, to unbreak softlockup.c 

Well, I'm happy with using jiffies as the backport fix for softlockup
(if sched_clock is indeed a problem there), but mainly because it won't
affect Xen.  I don't know what effect it will have on vmi though.

cpu_clock seems like a good approach for .23 onwards.  I guess I should
test it at some point...

    J


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/