Re: other potential candidates for removal?

[Jesper Juhl]

On 18/07/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>    a while back, i threw together this wiki page:
>
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed
>
> feel free to comment.
Some comments on that list :

} PCMCIA IOCTL support
}
} Currently listed in the removal file as scheduled for deletion back
in November of 2005, but
} there's some debate as to whether it's really ready to go.

If you remove that don't you run the risk of breaking existing
userspace (something which we don't do lightly) ?  Same goes for other
IOCTL's on the list as well as the ulog support.

Also, some items seem to have made the list since they depend on
BROKEN_ON_SMP or have no active maintainer.  As for depending on
BROKEN_ON_SMP, as long as the drivers work fine on UP they may have
users, so removing them would constitute regressions for those users -
especially if there's no replacement driver. Wouldn't it be better to
try and get those BROKEN_ON_SMP drivers to become SMP safe instead of
just removing them (or just leave them as-is if they work for some
people on UP)?
As for the lack of an active maintainer being a partial reason for
removal. I don't agree with that. As long as the code works and gets
fixed up to continue working when other parts of the kernel evolve,
then I see no reason to remove the code just because noone is actively
maintaining it. Sometimes unmaintained code even grow new maintainers
after a while.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/