Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > As soon as you add another loop the difference changes again, while 
> > it's always correct to say it gets 25% more cpu time [...]
> 
> yep, and i'll add the relative effect to the comment too.

Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence?
To illustrate the problem a little different: a task with a nice level -20 
got around 700% more cpu time (or 8 times more), now it gets 8500% more 
cpu time (or 86.7 times more).
You don't think that change to the nice levels is a little drastic?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/