Re: [V9fs-developer] [GIT PULL] 9p Patches for 2.6.23 merge window

From: Latchesar Ionkov
Date: Sun Jul 15 2007 - 20:30:39 EST


I thought that it is not a good idea to keep the v9fs_ prefix for code
that is in different places (fs/9p and net/9p). If keeping the old
prefix is more acceptable, I can create a new patch without the
"v9fs_"->"p9_" renames.

Thanks,
Lucho

On 7/15/07, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
>
> The bulk of the changes were in the reorganization patch which mostly
> moved files and interfaces around in preparation for work on an
> in-kernel 9p server.

Please use "git diff -C --stat --summary" to generate the diffstat
summary.

In particular, because you didn't use -C (or -M), git have you an
old-style diffstat without renames, so the diffstat doesn't show that a
lot of it was moving code around.

(That said, you seem to have changed names a lot too, so it's not pure
code movement).

> 49 files changed, 5400 insertions(+), 5092 deletions(-)

With rename detection enabled, I get

36 files changed, 3444 insertions(+), 3130 deletions(-)

due to finding some (partially dubious) renames:

rename fs/9p/mux.h => include/net/9p/conn.h (53%)
rename {fs => include/net}/9p/transport.h (59%)
rename {fs => net}/9p/conv.c (55%)
rename {fs => net}/9p/fcprint.c (64%)
rename {fs => net}/9p/mux.c (55%)

even though is misses a lot of others (due to all the "v9fs" -> "p9"
changes in the source code too - was that really worth it?).

Linus

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
V9fs-developer mailing list
V9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/v9fs-developer

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/