PATCH [1/5] fs/file_table.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Sun Jul 15 2007 - 14:58:23 EST


fs/file_table.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
in fs_may_remount_ro()

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@xxxxxxxxx>

--

diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
index d17fd69..3ddd993 100644
--- a/fs/file_table.c
+++ b/fs/file_table.c
@@ -264,12 +264,11 @@ void file_kill(struct file *file)

int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block *sb)
{
- struct list_head *p;
+ struct file *file;

/* Check that no files are currently opened for writing. */
file_list_lock();
- list_for_each(p, &sb->s_files) {
- struct file *file = list_entry(p, struct file, f_u.fu_list);
+ list_for_each_entry(file, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;

/* File with pending delete? */

--
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona

The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily
exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking
.''`.
using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org : :' :
`. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4 `-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/