PATCH [1/5] fs/file_table.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date:  Sun Jul 15 2007 - 14:58:23 EST
fs/file_table.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
in fs_may_remount_ro()
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@xxxxxxxxx>
--
diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
index d17fd69..3ddd993 100644
--- a/fs/file_table.c
+++ b/fs/file_table.c
@@ -264,12 +264,11 @@ void file_kill(struct file *file)
 
 int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-	struct list_head *p;
+	struct file *file;
 
 	/* Check that no files are currently opened for writing. */
 	file_list_lock();
-	list_for_each(p, &sb->s_files) {
-		struct file *file = list_entry(p, struct file, f_u.fu_list);
+	list_for_each_entry(file, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
 		struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
 
 		/* File with pending delete? */
-- 
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona
      The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily
        exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking
                                                                 .''`.
    using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org  : :'  :
                                                                `. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4                  `-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/