Quite trivial patches listed as needing re-review? (was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

[Jesper Juhl]

On 10/07/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> submitchecklist-update-fix-spelling-error.patch
...
>  Merge, subject to re-review.
...
> add-missing-files-and-dirs-to-00-index-in-documentation.patch
> remove-the-last-few-umsdos-leftovers.patch
...
> Merge, subject to re-review.
[snip]

Can't speak for all the other patches, but the 3 listed above are
quite trivial and hardly touch any code at all. I'm wondering why they
are not just pushed upstream, but instead listed as "subject to
re-review" ?

Am I supposed to do anything to get them merged?


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/