Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference- git-bisect result

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Sun Jul 08 2007 - 13:42:49 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Al Viro wrote:
> Like hell. At the very least you want it to be opened for write.
> And even that is dubious, since "process has write access to file"
> is not quite the same thing as "somebody had given the process a
> descriptor opened for write".

But the real permissions tests are performed in notify_change. I think
all this is consistent with how, for instance, fchmod works. The
additional tests in fchmod which aren't here (IS_RDONLY and IS_APPEND)
would also apply to the case where a file name is given. So, either the
code was inconsistent already are these tests are really not needed.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGkSHa2ijCOnn/RHQRAp0RAJ9ouvOd52feTPuFurxj8LzHZuGZsACgwxA8
ybEo1xmvakkKVenWc07PYhs=
=5DBy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/